CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

C 6X13 vs MC 6X12

C 6X13 is an C section from the American AISC Shapes Database; MC 6X12 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. MC 6X12 carries more bending: 122.41 cm³ of plastic modulus against 119.46 cm³, 2.4% more. MC 6X12 is the lighter of the two at 17.9 kg/m against 19.3 kg/m, a saving of 7.8% on steel weight. Both are about 152 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyC 6X13
C
MC 6X12
MC
Difference
Mass19.3 kg/m17.9 kg/m+7.8%
Depth152.4 mm152.4 mmsame
Width54.9 mm63.5 mm-13.5%
Web thickness11.1 mm7.9 mm+40.5%
Flange thickness8.7 mm9.5 mm-8.4%
Area24.6 cm²22.8 cm²+7.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)720.1 cm⁴778.4 cm⁴-7.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)119.46 cm³122.41 cm³-2.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)94.717 cm³102.26 cm³-7.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)43.7 cm⁴77 cm⁴-43.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)22.123 cm³32.283 cm³-31.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)1.33 cm1.84 cm-27.7%
Torsion constant (It)9.86 cm⁴6.45 cm⁴+52.9%

C 6X13 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; MC 6X12 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to MC 6X12.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, MC 6X12 has the larger second moment of area: 778.4 cm⁴ against 720.1 cm⁴, a difference of 7.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, MC 6X12 is the more efficient section: 6.8 against 6.2 cm³ per kg/m, 9.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: MC 6X12 has 32.283 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 22.123 cm³, 31.5% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

In short, MC 6X12 is the stronger section and MC 6X12 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

MC 6X12 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 122.41 cm³ against 119.46 cm³ - 2.4% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

MC 6X12 at 17.9 kg/m, against 19.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 7.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: MC 6X12 gives 122.41 cm³ of plastic modulus and 778.4 cm⁴ of inertia against 119.46 cm³ and 720.1 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

MC 6X12, with a second moment of area of 778.4 cm⁴ against 720.1 cm⁴ (7.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…