CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 10X19 vs H-250x125x6x9-29

W 10X19 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-250x125x6x9-29 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 353.96 cm³ against 358 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.1%. W 10X19 is the lighter of the two at 28.3 kg/m against 29 kg/m, a saving of 2.4% on steel weight. W 10X19 is deeper, 259.1 mm against 250 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 10X19
W
H-250x125x6x9-29
MB & MC
Difference
Mass28.3 kg/m29 kg/m-2.4%
Depth259.1 mm250 mm+3.6%
Width102.1 mm125 mm-18.3%
Web thickness6.4 mm6 mm+6.7%
Flange thickness10 mm9 mm+11.1%
Area36.3 cm²37 cm²-1.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)4,008 cm⁴3,965 cm⁴+1.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)353.96 cm³358 cm³-1.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)308.08 cm³317 cm³-2.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)178.6 cm⁴294 cm⁴-39.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)54.897 cm³72.7 cm³-24.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.22 cm2.82 cm-21.3%
Torsion constant (It)9.7 cm⁴8.51 cm⁴+14.0%

W 10X19 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-250x125x6x9-29 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-250x125x6x9-29.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 10X19 has the larger second moment of area: 4,008 cm⁴ against 3,965 cm⁴, a difference of 1.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (12.5 against 12.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-250x125x6x9-29 has 72.7 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 54.897 cm³, 24.5% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.4% weight.

In short, H-250x125x6x9-29 is the stronger section and W 10X19 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 10X19 has a plastic modulus of 353.96 cm³ and H-250x125x6x9-29 has 358 cm³, a difference of only 1.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 10X19 at 28.3 kg/m, against 29 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.4%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-250x125x6x9-29 gives 358 cm³ of plastic modulus and 3,965 cm⁴ of inertia against 353.96 cm³ and 4,008 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 10X19, with a second moment of area of 4,008 cm⁴ against 3,965 cm⁴ (1.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 254×102×28 vs W 10X19UB 254×102×28 vs H-250x125x6x9-29
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…