CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 10X22 vs IPE A 270

W 10X22 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; IPE A 270 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 10X22 carries more bending: 426.06 cm³ of plastic modulus against 413 cm³, 3.2% more. IPE A 270 is the lighter of the two at 30.7 kg/m against 32.7 kg/m, a saving of 6.5% on steel weight. IPE A 270 is deeper, 267 mm against 259.1 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 10X22
W
IPE A 270
IPE
Difference
Mass32.7 kg/m30.7 kg/m+6.5%
Depth259.1 mm267 mm-3.0%
Width146 mm135 mm+8.1%
Web thickness6.1 mm5.5 mm+10.9%
Flange thickness9.1 mm8.7 mm+4.6%
Area41.9 cm²39.2 cm²+6.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)4,912 cm⁴4,920 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)426.06 cm³413 cm³+3.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)380.18 cm³368 cm³+3.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)474.5 cm⁴358 cm⁴+32.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)99.961 cm³82.3 cm³+21.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.38 cm3.02 cm+11.9%
Torsion constant (It)9.95 cm⁴10.4 cm⁴-4.3%

W 10X22 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; IPE A 270 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE A 270.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE A 270 has the larger second moment of area: 4,920 cm⁴ against 4,912 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, IPE A 270 is the more efficient section: 13.5 against 13.0 cm³ per kg/m, 3.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 10X22 has 99.961 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 82.3 cm³, 21.5% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 6.5% weight.

In short, W 10X22 is the stronger section and IPE A 270 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 10X22 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 426.06 cm³ against 413 cm³ - 3.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

IPE A 270 at 30.7 kg/m, against 32.7 kg/m for the other - a saving of 6.5%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE A 270 gives 413 cm³ of plastic modulus and 4,920 cm⁴ of inertia against 426.06 cm³ and 4,912 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE A 270, with a second moment of area of 4,920 cm⁴ against 4,912 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…