CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 10X33 vs H-250x175x8x13

W 10X33 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-250x175x8x13 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. H-250x175x8x13 carries more bending: 660 cm³ of plastic modulus against 635.82 cm³, 3.7% more. W 10X33 is the lighter of the two at 49.1 kg/m against 51.6 kg/m, a saving of 4.8% on steel weight. Both are about 248 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 10X33
W
H-250x175x8x13
MB & MC
Difference
Mass49.1 kg/m51.6 kg/m-4.8%
Depth247.1 mm248 mm-0.4%
Width202.2 mm176 mm+14.9%
Web thickness7.4 mm8 mm-7.5%
Flange thickness11 mm13 mm-15.4%
Area62.6 cm²65.7 cm²-4.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)7,118 cm⁴7,308 cm⁴-2.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)635.82 cm³660 cm³-3.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)573.55 cm³589 cm³-2.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,523 cm⁴1,184 cm⁴+28.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)229.42 cm³207 cm³+10.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.93 cm4.24 cm+16.3%
Torsion constant (It)24.27 cm⁴36.1 cm⁴-32.8%

W 10X33 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-250x175x8x13 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-250x175x8x13.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-250x175x8x13 has the larger second moment of area: 7,308 cm⁴ against 7,118 cm⁴, a difference of 2.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (12.9 against 12.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 10X33 has 229.42 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 207 cm³, 10.8% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.8% weight.

In short, H-250x175x8x13 is the stronger section and W 10X33 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

H-250x175x8x13 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 660 cm³ against 635.82 cm³ - 3.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

W 10X33 at 49.1 kg/m, against 51.6 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-250x175x8x13 gives 660 cm³ of plastic modulus and 7,308 cm⁴ of inertia against 635.82 cm³ and 7,118 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-250x175x8x13, with a second moment of area of 7,308 cm⁴ against 7,118 cm⁴ (2.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…