CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 10X68 vs H-250x250x12x19

W 10X68 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-250x250x12x19 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 10X68 carries more bending: 1397.8 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1330 cm³, 5.1% more. H-250x250x12x19 is the lighter of the two at 98.1 kg/m against 101.2 kg/m, a saving of 3.2% on steel weight. Both are about 262 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 10X68
W
H-250x250x12x19
MB & MC
Difference
Mass101.2 kg/m98.1 kg/m+3.2%
Depth264.2 mm260 mm+1.6%
Width256.5 mm253 mm+1.4%
Web thickness11.9 mm12 mm-0.8%
Flange thickness19.6 mm19 mm+3.2%
Area128.4 cm²125 cm²+2.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)16,400 cm⁴15,340 cm⁴+6.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,397.8 cm³1,330 cm³+5.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,240.5 cm³1,180 cm³+5.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)5,578 cm⁴5,134 cm⁴+8.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)657.12 cm³618 cm³+6.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.58 cm6.41 cm+2.7%
Torsion constant (It)148.2 cm⁴141 cm⁴+5.1%

W 10X68 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-250x250x12x19 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-250x250x12x19.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 10X68 has the larger second moment of area: 16,400 cm⁴ against 15,340 cm⁴, a difference of 6.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (13.8 against 13.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.2% weight.

In short, W 10X68 is the stronger section and H-250x250x12x19 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 10X68 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1397.8 cm³ against 1330 cm³ - 5.1% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

H-250x250x12x19 at 98.1 kg/m, against 101.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-250x250x12x19 gives 1330 cm³ of plastic modulus and 15,340 cm⁴ of inertia against 1397.8 cm³ and 16,400 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 10X68, with a second moment of area of 16,400 cm⁴ against 15,340 cm⁴ (6.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

HE 260 B vs H-250x250x12x19
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…