CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 12X50 vs H-300x200x10x17

W 12X50 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-300x200x10x17 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. H-300x200x10x17 carries more bending: 1204 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1178.2 cm³, 2.1% more. W 12X50 is the lighter of the two at 74.4 kg/m against 77.3 kg/m, a saving of 3.8% on steel weight. Both are about 307 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 12X50
W
H-300x200x10x17
MB & MC
Difference
Mass74.4 kg/m77.3 kg/m-3.8%
Depth309.9 mm304 mm+1.9%
Width205.2 mm202 mm+1.6%
Web thickness9.4 mm10 mm-6.0%
Flange thickness16.3 mm17 mm-4.1%
Area94.2 cm²98.5 cm²-4.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)16,275 cm⁴16,280 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,178.2 cm³1,204 cm³-2.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,052 cm³1,071 cm³-1.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,343 cm⁴2,341 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)349.04 cm³356 cm³-2.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.98 cm4.88 cm+2.0%
Torsion constant (It)71.18 cm⁴87.8 cm⁴-18.9%

W 12X50 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-300x200x10x17 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-300x200x10x17.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-300x200x10x17 has the larger second moment of area: 16,280 cm⁴ against 16,275 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (15.8 against 15.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.8% weight.

In short, H-300x200x10x17 is the stronger section and W 12X50 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

H-300x200x10x17 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1204 cm³ against 1178.2 cm³ - 2.1% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

W 12X50 at 74.4 kg/m, against 77.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-300x200x10x17 gives 1204 cm³ of plastic modulus and 16,280 cm⁴ of inertia against 1178.2 cm³ and 16,275 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-300x200x10x17, with a second moment of area of 16,280 cm⁴ against 16,275 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 12X50 vs HE 320 AAW 12X50 vs HP 12X53
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…