CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X109 vs HP 14X117

W 14X109 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HP 14X117 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3146.3 cm³ against 3179.1 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.0%. W 14X109 is the lighter of the two at 162.2 kg/m against 174.1 kg/m, a saving of 6.8% on steel weight. Both are about 362 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X109
W
HP 14X117
HP
Difference
Mass162.2 kg/m174.1 kg/m-6.8%
Depth363.2 mm360.7 mm+0.7%
Width370.8 mm378.5 mm-2.0%
Web thickness13.3 mm20.4 mm-34.8%
Flange thickness21.8 mm20.4 mm+6.9%
Area206.5 cm²221.9 cm²-6.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)51,613 cm⁴50,780 cm⁴+1.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,146.3 cm³3,179.1 cm³-1.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,835 cm³2,818.6 cm³+0.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)18,606 cm⁴18,439 cm⁴+0.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,519.1 cm³1,497.8 cm³+1.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.47 cm9.12 cm+3.8%
Torsion constant (It)296.4 cm⁴333.8 cm⁴-11.2%

W 14X109 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HP 14X117 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to HP 14X117.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 14X109 has the larger second moment of area: 51,613 cm⁴ against 50,780 cm⁴, a difference of 1.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 14X109 is the more efficient section: 19.4 against 18.3 cm³ per kg/m, 6.2% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

In short, HP 14X117 is the stronger section and W 14X109 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 14X109 has a plastic modulus of 3146.3 cm³ and HP 14X117 has 3179.1 cm³, a difference of only 1.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 14X109 at 162.2 kg/m, against 174.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 6.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HP 14X117 gives 3179.1 cm³ of plastic modulus and 50,780 cm⁴ of inertia against 3146.3 cm³ and 51,613 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

W 14X109, with a second moment of area of 51,613 cm⁴ against 50,780 cm⁴ (1.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 14X109 vs H-400x400x11x18
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…