CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X426 vs H-400x400x45x70

W 14X426 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-400x400x45x70 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 14240.4 cm³ against 14460 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.5%. H-400x400x45x70 is the lighter of the two at 605 kg/m against 634 kg/m, a saving of 4.8% on steel weight. H-400x400x45x70 is deeper, 498 mm against 475 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X426
W
H-400x400x45x70
MB & MC
Difference
Mass634 kg/m605 kg/m+4.8%
Depth475 mm498 mm-4.6%
Width424.2 mm432 mm-1.8%
Web thickness47.8 mm45 mm+6.2%
Flange thickness77.2 mm70 mm+10.3%
Area806.5 cm²770 cm²+4.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)274,713 cm⁴297,900 cm⁴-7.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)14,240.4 cm³14,460 cm³-1.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)11,569.3 cm³11,960 cm³-3.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)98,231 cm⁴94,360 cm⁴+4.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)7,112 cm³6,724 cm³+5.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)11.02 cm11.1 cm-0.7%
Torsion constant (It)13,777 cm⁴11,060 cm⁴+24.6%

W 14X426 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-400x400x45x70 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-400x400x45x70.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-400x400x45x70 has the larger second moment of area: 297,900 cm⁴ against 274,713 cm⁴, a difference of 7.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-400x400x45x70 is the more efficient section: 23.9 against 22.5 cm³ per kg/m, 6.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.8% weight.

In short, H-400x400x45x70 is the stronger section and H-400x400x45x70 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 14X426 has a plastic modulus of 14240.4 cm³ and H-400x400x45x70 has 14460 cm³, a difference of only 1.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

H-400x400x45x70 at 605 kg/m, against 634 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-400x400x45x70 gives 14460 cm³ of plastic modulus and 297,900 cm⁴ of inertia against 14240.4 cm³ and 274,713 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-400x400x45x70, with a second moment of area of 297,900 cm⁴ against 274,713 cm⁴ (7.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×406×634 vs W 14X426UC 356×406×634 vs H-400x400x45x70
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…