CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X48 vs H-350x175x10x16

W 14X48 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-350x175x10x16 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1284.7 cm³ against 1276 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.7%. They weigh essentially the same, 71.4 kg/m and 71.8 kg/m. H-350x175x10x16 is deeper, 360 mm against 350.5 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X48
W
H-350x175x10x16
MB & MC
Difference
Mass71.4 kg/m71.8 kg/m-0.6%
Depth350.5 mm360 mm-2.6%
Width204 mm178 mm+14.6%
Web thickness8.6 mm10 mm-14.0%
Flange thickness15.1 mm16 mm-5.6%
Area91 cm²91.4 cm²-0.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)20,146 cm⁴20,240 cm⁴-0.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,284.7 cm³1,276 cm³+0.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,150.4 cm³1,124 cm³+2.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,139 cm⁴1,508 cm⁴+41.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)321.19 cm³263 cm³+22.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.85 cm4.06 cm+19.5%
Torsion constant (It)60.35 cm⁴66.3 cm⁴-9.0%

W 14X48 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-350x175x10x16 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-350x175x10x16.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-350x175x10x16 has the larger second moment of area: 20,240 cm⁴ against 20,146 cm⁴, a difference of 0.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (18.0 against 17.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 14X48 has 321.19 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 263 cm³, 22.1% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 14X48 has a plastic modulus of 1284.7 cm³ and H-350x175x10x16 has 1276 cm³, a difference of only 0.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 14X48 is 71.4 kg/m and H-350x175x10x16 is 71.8 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-350x175x10x16 gives 1276 cm³ of plastic modulus and 20,240 cm⁴ of inertia against 1284.7 cm³ and 20,146 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-350x175x10x16, with a second moment of area of 20,240 cm⁴ against 20,146 cm⁴ (0.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…