CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X90 vs H-350x350x12x19-137

W 14X90 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-350x350x12x19-137 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2572.8 cm³ against 2545 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.1%. W 14X90 is the lighter of the two at 133.9 kg/m against 137 kg/m, a saving of 2.3% on steel weight. Both are about 353 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X90
W
H-350x350x12x19-137
MB & MC
Difference
Mass133.9 kg/m137 kg/m-2.3%
Depth355.6 mm350 mm+1.6%
Width368.3 mm350 mm+5.2%
Web thickness11.2 mm12 mm-6.7%
Flange thickness18 mm19 mm-5.3%
Area171 cm²174 cm²-1.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)41,582 cm⁴40,300 cm⁴+3.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,572.8 cm³2,545 cm³+1.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,343.4 cm³2,303 cm³+1.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)15,068 cm⁴13,590 cm⁴+10.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,238.9 cm³1,179 cm³+5.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.4 cm8.84 cm+6.3%
Torsion constant (It)169 cm⁴199 cm⁴-15.1%

W 14X90 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-350x350x12x19-137 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-350x350x12x19-137.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 14X90 has the larger second moment of area: 41,582 cm⁴ against 40,300 cm⁴, a difference of 3.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 14X90 is the more efficient section: 19.2 against 18.6 cm³ per kg/m, 3.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.3% weight.

In short, W 14X90 is the stronger section and W 14X90 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 14X90 has a plastic modulus of 2572.8 cm³ and H-350x350x12x19-137 has 2545 cm³, a difference of only 1.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 14X90 at 133.9 kg/m, against 137 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.3%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-350x350x12x19-137 gives 2545 cm³ of plastic modulus and 40,300 cm⁴ of inertia against 2572.8 cm³ and 41,582 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 14X90, with a second moment of area of 41,582 cm⁴ against 40,300 cm⁴ (3.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×368×129 vs W 14X90W 14X90 vs HE 360 B
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…