CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 16X57 vs IPE V 400

W 16X57 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; IPE V 400 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 16X57 carries more bending: 1720.6 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1680 cm³, 2.4% more. They weigh essentially the same, 84.8 kg/m and 84 kg/m. W 16X57 is deeper, 416.6 mm against 408 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 16X57
W
IPE V 400
IPE
Difference
Mass84.8 kg/m84 kg/m+1.0%
Depth416.6 mm408 mm+2.1%
Width180.8 mm182 mm-0.7%
Web thickness10.9 mm10.6 mm+2.8%
Flange thickness18.2 mm17.5 mm+4.0%
Area108.4 cm²107 cm²+1.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)31,550 cm⁴30,100 cm⁴+4.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,720.6 cm³1,680 cm³+2.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,510.9 cm³1,480 cm³+2.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,794 cm⁴1,770 cm⁴+1.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)309.72 cm³304 cm³+1.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.06 cm4.06 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)92.4 cm⁴99.6 cm⁴-7.2%

W 16X57 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; IPE V 400 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE V 400.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 16X57 has the larger second moment of area: 31,550 cm⁴ against 30,100 cm⁴, a difference of 4.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (20.3 against 20.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 16X57 is the stronger section and IPE V 400 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 16X57 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1720.6 cm³ against 1680 cm³ - 2.4% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 16X57 is 84.8 kg/m and IPE V 400 is 84 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE V 400 gives 1680 cm³ of plastic modulus and 30,100 cm⁴ of inertia against 1720.6 cm³ and 31,550 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 16X57, with a second moment of area of 31,550 cm⁴ against 30,100 cm⁴ (4.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 406×178×85 vs IPE V 400UB 406×178×85 vs W 16X57
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…