CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 16X67 vs H-400x300x10x16-105

W 16X67 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-400x300x10x16-105 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2130.3 cm³ against 2141 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. W 16X67 is the lighter of the two at 99.7 kg/m against 105 kg/m, a saving of 5.0% on steel weight. W 16X67 is deeper, 414 mm against 390 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 16X67
W
H-400x300x10x16-105
MB & MC
Difference
Mass99.7 kg/m105 kg/m-5.0%
Depth414 mm390 mm+6.2%
Width259.1 mm300 mm-13.6%
Web thickness10 mm10 mmsame
Flange thickness16.9 mm16 mm+5.6%
Area126.5 cm²133 cm²-4.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)39,708 cm⁴37,860 cm⁴+4.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,130.3 cm³2,141 cm³-0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,917.3 cm³1,942 cm³-1.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,953 cm⁴7,204 cm⁴-31.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)581.74 cm³730 cm³-20.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.25 cm7.35 cm-15.0%
Torsion constant (It)99.48 cm⁴100 cm⁴-0.5%

W 16X67 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-400x300x10x16-105 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-400x300x10x16-105.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 16X67 has the larger second moment of area: 39,708 cm⁴ against 37,860 cm⁴, a difference of 4.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 16X67 is the more efficient section: 21.4 against 20.4 cm³ per kg/m, 4.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-400x300x10x16-105 has 730 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 581.74 cm³, 20.3% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.0% weight.

In short, H-400x300x10x16-105 is the stronger section and W 16X67 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 16X67 has a plastic modulus of 2130.3 cm³ and H-400x300x10x16-105 has 2141 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 16X67 at 99.7 kg/m, against 105 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-400x300x10x16-105 gives 2141 cm³ of plastic modulus and 37,860 cm⁴ of inertia against 2130.3 cm³ and 39,708 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 16X67, with a second moment of area of 39,708 cm⁴ against 37,860 cm⁴ (4.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 16X67 vs HE 450 AA
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…