CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 18X192 vs HE 500 M

W 18X192 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 500 M is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 18X192 carries more bending: 7243.1 cm³ of plastic modulus against 7090 cm³, 2.2% more. HE 500 M is the lighter of the two at 270 kg/m against 285.7 kg/m, a saving of 5.8% on steel weight. Both are about 521 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 18X192
W
HE 500 M
HE
Difference
Mass285.7 kg/m270 kg/m+5.8%
Depth518.2 mm524 mm-1.1%
Width292.1 mm306 mm-4.5%
Web thickness24.4 mm21 mm+16.2%
Flange thickness44.4 mm40 mm+11.0%
Area362.6 cm²344 cm²+5.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)161,082 cm⁴162,000 cm⁴-0.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)7,243.1 cm³7,090 cm³+2.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)6,227.1 cm³6,180 cm³+0.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)18,314 cm⁴19,200 cm⁴-4.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,950.1 cm³1,930 cm³+1.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.09 cm7.46 cm-5.0%
Torsion constant (It)1,861 cm⁴1,540 cm⁴+20.8%

W 18X192 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 500 M to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 500 M.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 500 M has the larger second moment of area: 162,000 cm⁴ against 161,082 cm⁴, a difference of 0.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 500 M is the more efficient section: 26.3 against 25.4 cm³ per kg/m, 3.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.8% weight.

In short, W 18X192 is the stronger section and HE 500 M is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 18X192 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 7243.1 cm³ against 7090 cm³ - 2.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

HE 500 M at 270 kg/m, against 285.7 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 500 M gives 7090 cm³ of plastic modulus and 162,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 7243.1 cm³ and 161,082 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 500 M, with a second moment of area of 162,000 cm⁴ against 161,082 cm⁴ (0.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 21X166 vs HE 500 M
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…