CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 18X76 vs H-500x300x11x15-111

W 18X76 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-500x300x11x15-111 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2671.1 cm³ against 2696 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.9%. They weigh essentially the same, 113.1 kg/m and 111 kg/m. H-500x300x11x15-111 is deeper, 482 mm against 462.3 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 18X76
W
H-500x300x11x15-111
MB & MC
Difference
Mass113.1 kg/m111 kg/m+1.9%
Depth462.3 mm482 mm-4.1%
Width279.4 mm300 mm-6.9%
Web thickness10.8 mm11 mm-1.8%
Flange thickness17.3 mm15 mm+15.3%
Area143.9 cm²141 cm²+2.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)55,359 cm⁴58,270 cm⁴-5.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,671.1 cm³2,696 cm³-0.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,392.5 cm³2,418 cm³-1.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)6,327 cm⁴6,756 cm⁴-6.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)691.53 cm³690 cm³+0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.63 cm6.92 cm-4.2%
Torsion constant (It)117.8 cm⁴93.9 cm⁴+25.5%

W 18X76 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-500x300x11x15-111 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-500x300x11x15-111.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-500x300x11x15-111 has the larger second moment of area: 58,270 cm⁴ against 55,359 cm⁴, a difference of 5.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-500x300x11x15-111 is the more efficient section: 24.3 against 23.6 cm³ per kg/m, 2.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 18X76 has a plastic modulus of 2671.1 cm³ and H-500x300x11x15-111 has 2696 cm³, a difference of only 0.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 18X76 is 113.1 kg/m and H-500x300x11x15-111 is 111 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-500x300x11x15-111 gives 2696 cm³ of plastic modulus and 58,270 cm⁴ of inertia against 2671.1 cm³ and 55,359 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-500x300x11x15-111, with a second moment of area of 58,270 cm⁴ against 55,359 cm⁴ (5.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 18X76 vs HE 500 AA
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…