CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 21X201 vs HE 600 M

W 21X201 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 600 M is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 8685.1 cm³ against 8770 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.0%. HE 600 M is the lighter of the two at 285 kg/m against 299.1 kg/m, a saving of 4.9% on steel weight. HE 600 M is deeper, 620 mm against 584.2 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 21X201
W
HE 600 M
HE
Difference
Mass299.1 kg/m285 kg/m+4.9%
Depth584.2 mm620 mm-5.8%
Width320 mm305 mm+4.9%
Web thickness23.1 mm21 mm+10.0%
Flange thickness41.4 mm40 mm+3.5%
Area382.6 cm²364 cm²+5.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)221,019 cm⁴237,000 cm⁴-6.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)8,685.1 cm³8,770 cm³-1.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)7,554.4 cm³7,660 cm³-1.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)22,560 cm⁴19,000 cm⁴+18.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,179.5 cm³1,930 cm³+12.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.67 cm7.22 cm+6.2%
Torsion constant (It)1,702 cm⁴1,570 cm⁴+8.4%

W 21X201 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 600 M to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 600 M.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 600 M has the larger second moment of area: 237,000 cm⁴ against 221,019 cm⁴, a difference of 6.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 600 M is the more efficient section: 30.8 against 29.0 cm³ per kg/m, 5.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 21X201 has 2179.5 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1930 cm³, 12.9% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.9% weight.

In short, HE 600 M is the stronger section and HE 600 M is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 21X201 has a plastic modulus of 8685.1 cm³ and HE 600 M has 8770 cm³, a difference of only 1.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

HE 600 M at 285 kg/m, against 299.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.9%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 600 M gives 8770 cm³ of plastic modulus and 237,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 8685.1 cm³ and 221,019 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 600 M, with a second moment of area of 237,000 cm⁴ against 221,019 cm⁴ (6.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…