CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 27X129 vs H-700x300x13x24-185

W 27X129 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-700x300x13x24-185 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 6472.9 cm³ against 6464 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. H-700x300x13x24-185 is the lighter of the two at 185 kg/m against 192 kg/m, a saving of 3.8% on steel weight. Both are about 701 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 27X129
W
H-700x300x13x24-185
MB & MC
Difference
Mass192 kg/m185 kg/m+3.8%
Depth701 mm700 mm+0.1%
Width254 mm300 mm-15.3%
Web thickness15.5 mm13 mm+19.2%
Flange thickness27.9 mm24 mm+16.2%
Area243.9 cm²235 cm²+3.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)198,126 cm⁴201,500 cm⁴-1.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)6,472.9 cm³6,464 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)5,653.5 cm³5,757 cm³-1.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)7,659 cm⁴10,830 cm⁴-29.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)943.89 cm³1,116 cm³-15.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.61 cm6.78 cm-17.3%
Torsion constant (It)462 cm⁴383 cm⁴+20.6%

W 27X129 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-700x300x13x24-185 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-700x300x13x24-185.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-700x300x13x24-185 has the larger second moment of area: 201,500 cm⁴ against 198,126 cm⁴, a difference of 1.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-700x300x13x24-185 is the more efficient section: 34.9 against 33.7 cm³ per kg/m, 3.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-700x300x13x24-185 has 1116 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 943.89 cm³, 15.4% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.8% weight.

In short, W 27X129 is the stronger section and H-700x300x13x24-185 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 27X129 has a plastic modulus of 6472.9 cm³ and H-700x300x13x24-185 has 6464 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

H-700x300x13x24-185 at 185 kg/m, against 192 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-700x300x13x24-185 gives 6464 cm³ of plastic modulus and 201,500 cm⁴ of inertia against 6472.9 cm³ and 198,126 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-700x300x13x24-185, with a second moment of area of 201,500 cm⁴ against 198,126 cm⁴ (1.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…