CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 27X146 vs H-700x300x15x28

W 27X146 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-700x300x15x28 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 7603.6 cm³ against 7559 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.6%. They weigh essentially the same, 217.3 kg/m and 215 kg/m. Both are about 702 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 27X146
W
H-700x300x15x28
MB & MC
Difference
Mass217.3 kg/m215 kg/m+1.1%
Depth696 mm708 mm-1.7%
Width355.6 mm302 mm+17.7%
Web thickness15.4 mm15 mm+2.7%
Flange thickness24.8 mm28 mm-11.4%
Area278.7 cm²274 cm²+1.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)235,587 cm⁴237,100 cm⁴-0.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)7,603.6 cm³7,559 cm³+0.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)6,784.2 cm³6,699 cm³+1.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)18,439 cm⁴12,890 cm⁴+43.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,601 cm³1,323 cm³+21.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)8.13 cm6.86 cm+18.5%
Torsion constant (It)470.3 cm⁴588 cm⁴-20.0%

W 27X146 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-700x300x15x28 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-700x300x15x28.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-700x300x15x28 has the larger second moment of area: 237,100 cm⁴ against 235,587 cm⁴, a difference of 0.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (35.0 against 35.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 27X146 has 1601 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1323 cm³, 21.0% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 27X146 has a plastic modulus of 7603.6 cm³ and H-700x300x15x28 has 7559 cm³, a difference of only 0.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 27X146 is 217.3 kg/m and H-700x300x15x28 is 215 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-700x300x15x28 gives 7559 cm³ of plastic modulus and 237,100 cm⁴ of inertia against 7603.6 cm³ and 235,587 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-700x300x15x28, with a second moment of area of 237,100 cm⁴ against 235,587 cm⁴ (0.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…