CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 30X99 vs IPE 750 x 147

W 30X99 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; IPE 750 x 147 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 5112.8 cm³ against 5110 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 147.3 kg/m and 147 kg/m. Both are about 754 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 30X99
W
IPE 750 x 147
IPE
Difference
Mass147.3 kg/m147 kg/m+0.2%
Depth754.4 mm753 mm+0.2%
Width266.7 mm265 mm+0.6%
Web thickness13.2 mm13.2 mmsame
Flange thickness17 mm17 mmsame
Area187.1 cm²188 cm²-0.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)166,076 cm⁴166,000 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)5,112.8 cm³5,110 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,408.1 cm³4,410 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)5,328 cm⁴5,290 cm⁴+0.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)632.54 cm³631 cm³+0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.33 cm5.31 cm+0.4%
Torsion constant (It)156.9 cm⁴157 cm⁴-0.1%

W 30X99 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; IPE 750 x 147 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE 750 x 147.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 30X99 has the larger second moment of area: 166,076 cm⁴ against 166,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (34.7 against 34.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 30X99 has a plastic modulus of 5112.8 cm³ and IPE 750 x 147 has 5110 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 30X99 is 147.3 kg/m and IPE 750 x 147 is 147 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE 750 x 147 gives 5110 cm³ of plastic modulus and 166,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 5112.8 cm³ and 166,076 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 30X99, with a second moment of area of 166,076 cm⁴ against 166,000 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 762×267×147 vs IPE 750 x 147UB 762×267×147 vs W 30X99
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…