CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 33X152 vs H-900x300x15x23-213

W 33X152 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-900x300x15x23-213 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 33X152 carries more bending: 9160.4 cm³ of plastic modulus against 8913 cm³, 2.8% more. H-900x300x15x23-213 is the lighter of the two at 213 kg/m against 226.2 kg/m, a saving of 6.2% on steel weight. H-900x300x15x23-213 is deeper, 890 mm against 850.9 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 33X152
W
H-900x300x15x23-213
MB & MC
Difference
Mass226.2 kg/m213 kg/m+6.2%
Depth850.9 mm890 mm-4.4%
Width294.6 mm299 mm-1.5%
Web thickness16.1 mm15 mm+7.3%
Flange thickness26.9 mm23 mm+17.0%
Area289.7 cm²271 cm²+6.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)339,645 cm⁴345,300 cm⁴-1.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)9,160.4 cm³8,913 cm³+2.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)7,980.5 cm³7,760 cm³+2.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)11,363 cm⁴10,290 cm⁴+10.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,211 cm³1,085 cm³+11.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.27 cm6.16 cm+1.8%
Torsion constant (It)516.1 cm⁴403 cm⁴+28.1%

W 33X152 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-900x300x15x23-213 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-900x300x15x23-213.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-900x300x15x23-213 has the larger second moment of area: 345,300 cm⁴ against 339,645 cm⁴, a difference of 1.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-900x300x15x23-213 is the more efficient section: 41.8 against 40.5 cm³ per kg/m, 3.2% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 33X152 has 1211 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1085 cm³, 11.6% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 6.2% weight.

In short, W 33X152 is the stronger section and H-900x300x15x23-213 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 33X152 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 9160.4 cm³ against 8913 cm³ - 2.8% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

H-900x300x15x23-213 at 213 kg/m, against 226.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 6.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-900x300x15x23-213 gives 8913 cm³ of plastic modulus and 345,300 cm⁴ of inertia against 9160.4 cm³ and 339,645 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-900x300x15x23-213, with a second moment of area of 345,300 cm⁴ against 339,645 cm⁴ (1.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 838×292×226 vs W 33X152UB 838×292×226 vs H-900x300x15x23-213
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…