CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 36X160 vs H-900x300x16x28-240

W 36X160 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-900x300x16x28-240 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 10225.5 cm³ against 10290 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.6%. They weigh essentially the same, 238.1 kg/m and 240 kg/m. Both are about 907 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 36X160
W
H-900x300x16x28-240
MB & MC
Difference
Mass238.1 kg/m240 kg/m-0.8%
Depth914.4 mm900 mm+1.6%
Width304.8 mm300 mm+1.6%
Web thickness16.5 mm16 mm+3.1%
Flange thickness25.9 mm28 mm-7.5%
Area303.2 cm²306 cm²-0.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)406,242 cm⁴404,500 cm⁴+0.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)10,225.5 cm³10,290 cm³-0.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)8,881.8 cm³8,989 cm³-1.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)12,279 cm⁴12,630 cm⁴-2.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,266.7 cm³1,317 cm³-3.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.35 cm6.43 cm-1.2%
Torsion constant (It)516.1 cm⁴580 cm⁴-11.0%

W 36X160 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-900x300x16x28-240 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-900x300x16x28-240.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 36X160 has the larger second moment of area: 406,242 cm⁴ against 404,500 cm⁴, a difference of 0.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (42.9 against 42.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 36X160 has a plastic modulus of 10225.5 cm³ and H-900x300x16x28-240 has 10290 cm³, a difference of only 0.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 36X160 is 238.1 kg/m and H-900x300x16x28-240 is 240 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-900x300x16x28-240 gives 10290 cm³ of plastic modulus and 404,500 cm⁴ of inertia against 10225.5 cm³ and 406,242 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 36X160, with a second moment of area of 406,242 cm⁴ against 404,500 cm⁴ (0.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 33X169 vs H-900x300x16x28-240
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…