CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 36X194 vs HE 900 B

W 36X194 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 900 B is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 12568.9 cm³ against 12600 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 288.7 kg/m and 291 kg/m. W 36X194 is deeper, 927.1 mm against 900 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 36X194
W
HE 900 B
HE
Difference
Mass288.7 kg/m291 kg/m-0.8%
Depth927.1 mm900 mm+3.0%
Width307.3 mm300 mm+2.4%
Web thickness19.4 mm18.5 mm+4.9%
Flange thickness32 mm35 mm-8.6%
Area367.7 cm²371 cm²-0.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)503,640 cm⁴494,000 cm⁴+2.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)12,568.9 cm³12,600 cm³-0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)10,881 cm³11,000 cm³-1.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)15,609 cm⁴15,800 cm⁴-1.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,601 cm³1,660 cm³-3.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.5 cm6.53 cm-0.5%
Torsion constant (It)924 cm⁴1,150 cm⁴-19.7%

W 36X194 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 900 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 900 B.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 36X194 has the larger second moment of area: 503,640 cm⁴ against 494,000 cm⁴, a difference of 2.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (43.5 against 43.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 36X194 has a plastic modulus of 12568.9 cm³ and HE 900 B has 12600 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 36X194 is 288.7 kg/m and HE 900 B is 291 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 900 B gives 12600 cm³ of plastic modulus and 494,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 12568.9 cm³ and 503,640 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 36X194, with a second moment of area of 503,640 cm⁴ against 494,000 cm⁴ (2.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 914×305×289 vs HE 900 BUB 914×305×289 vs W 36X194W 36X194 vs H-900x300x18x34-286W 33X201 vs HE 900 BHE 900 B vs H-900x300x18x34-286
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…