CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 36X210 vs H-900x300x19x37-307

W 36X210 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-900x300x19x37-307 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 13650.4 cm³ against 13540 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.8%. They weigh essentially the same, 312.5 kg/m and 307 kg/m. Both are about 925 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 36X210
W
H-900x300x19x37-307
MB & MC
Difference
Mass312.5 kg/m307 kg/m+1.8%
Depth932.2 mm918 mm+1.5%
Width309.9 mm303 mm+2.3%
Web thickness21.1 mm19 mm+11.1%
Flange thickness34.5 mm37 mm-6.8%
Area399.4 cm²391 cm²+2.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)549,425 cm⁴542,200 cm⁴+1.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)13,650.4 cm³13,540 cm³+0.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)11,782.3 cm³11,810 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)17,107 cm⁴17,230 cm⁴-0.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,753.4 cm³1,785 cm³-1.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.55 cm6.63 cm-1.2%
Torsion constant (It)1,165 cm⁴1,316 cm⁴-11.5%

W 36X210 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-900x300x19x37-307 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-900x300x19x37-307.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 36X210 has the larger second moment of area: 549,425 cm⁴ against 542,200 cm⁴, a difference of 1.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (43.7 against 44.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 36X210 has a plastic modulus of 13650.4 cm³ and H-900x300x19x37-307 has 13540 cm³, a difference of only 0.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 36X210 is 312.5 kg/m and H-900x300x19x37-307 is 307 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-900x300x19x37-307 gives 13540 cm³ of plastic modulus and 542,200 cm⁴ of inertia against 13650.4 cm³ and 549,425 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 36X210, with a second moment of area of 549,425 cm⁴ against 542,200 cm⁴ (1.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…