CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 40X278 vs HE 1000 x 415

W 40X278 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 1000 x 415 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 19500.6 cm³ against 19600 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. They weigh essentially the same, 413.7 kg/m and 415 kg/m. Both are about 1021 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 40X278
W
HE 1000 x 415
HE
Difference
Mass413.7 kg/m415 kg/m-0.3%
Depth1021.1 mm1020 mm+0.1%
Width304.8 mm304 mm+0.3%
Web thickness26.2 mm26 mm+0.8%
Flange thickness46 mm46 mmsame
Area531 cm²529 cm²+0.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)853,274 cm⁴853,000 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)19,500.6 cm³19,600 cm³-0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)16,714.8 cm³16,700 cm³+0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)21,686 cm⁴21,700 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,294.2 cm³2,300 cm³-0.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.4 cm6.41 cm-0.2%
Torsion constant (It)2,706 cm⁴2,700 cm⁴+0.2%

W 40X278 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 1000 x 415 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 x 415.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 40X278 has the larger second moment of area: 853,274 cm⁴ against 853,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (47.1 against 47.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 40X278 has a plastic modulus of 19500.6 cm³ and HE 1000 x 415 has 19600 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 40X278 is 413.7 kg/m and HE 1000 x 415 is 415 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 x 415 gives 19600 cm³ of plastic modulus and 853,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 19500.6 cm³ and 853,274 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 40X278, with a second moment of area of 853,274 cm⁴ against 853,000 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 40X278 vs UB 1016×305×393
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…