CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 6X16 vs HE 160 AA

W 6X16 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 160 AA is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 191.73 cm³ against 190 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.9%. They weigh essentially the same, 23.8 kg/m and 23.8 kg/m. W 6X16 is deeper, 159.5 mm against 148 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 6X16
W
HE 160 AA
HE
Difference
Mass23.8 kg/m23.8 kg/msame
Depth159.5 mm148 mm+7.8%
Width102.4 mm160 mm-36.0%
Web thickness6.6 mm4.5 mm+46.7%
Flange thickness10.3 mm7 mm+47.1%
Area30.6 cm²30.4 cm²+0.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,336 cm⁴1,280 cm⁴+4.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)191.73 cm³190 cm³+0.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)167.15 cm³173 cm³-3.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)184.4 cm⁴479 cm⁴-61.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)55.552 cm³91.4 cm³-39.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.46 cm3.97 cm-38.0%
Torsion constant (It)9.28 cm⁴6.43 cm⁴+44.3%

W 6X16 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 160 AA to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 160 AA.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 6X16 has the larger second moment of area: 1,336 cm⁴ against 1,280 cm⁴, a difference of 4.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (8.1 against 8.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: HE 160 AA has 91.4 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 55.552 cm³, 39.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 6X16 has a plastic modulus of 191.73 cm³ and HE 160 AA has 190 cm³, a difference of only 0.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 6X16 is 23.8 kg/m and HE 160 AA is 23.8 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 160 AA gives 190 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,280 cm⁴ of inertia against 191.73 cm³ and 1,336 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 6X16, with a second moment of area of 1,336 cm⁴ against 1,280 cm⁴ (4.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…