CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

WT 10.5X34 vs ST 10X33

WT 10.5X34 is an WT section from the American AISC Shapes Database; ST 10X33 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. ST 10X33 carries more bending: 383.46 cm³ of plastic modulus against 375.26 cm³, 2.1% more. ST 10X33 is the lighter of the two at 49.1 kg/m against 50.6 kg/m, a saving of 3.1% on steel weight. WT 10.5X34 is deeper, 269.2 mm against 254 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyWT 10.5X34
WT
ST 10X33
ST
Difference
Mass50.6 kg/m49.1 kg/m+3.1%
Depth269.2 mm254 mm+6.0%
Width210.1 mm159 mm+32.1%
Web thickness10.9 mm12.8 mm-14.8%
Flange thickness17.4 mm20.2 mm-13.9%
Area64.5 cm²62.6 cm²+3.0%
Second moment, major (Iy)4,287 cm⁴3,867 cm⁴+10.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)375.26 cm³383.46 cm³-2.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)211.39 cm³211.39 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,349 cm⁴570.2 cm⁴+136.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)199.92 cm³126.18 cm³+58.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.57 cm3.02 cm+51.3%
Torsion constant (It)50.78 cm⁴74.09 cm⁴-31.5%

WT 10.5X34 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; ST 10X33 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to ST 10X33.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, WT 10.5X34 has the larger second moment of area: 4,287 cm⁴ against 3,867 cm⁴, a difference of 10.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, ST 10X33 is the more efficient section: 7.8 against 7.4 cm³ per kg/m, 5.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: WT 10.5X34 has 199.92 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 126.18 cm³, 58.4% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

In short, ST 10X33 is the stronger section and ST 10X33 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

ST 10X33 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 383.46 cm³ against 375.26 cm³ - 2.1% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

ST 10X33 at 49.1 kg/m, against 50.6 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: ST 10X33 gives 383.46 cm³ of plastic modulus and 3,867 cm⁴ of inertia against 375.26 cm³ and 4,287 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

WT 10.5X34, with a second moment of area of 4,287 cm⁴ against 3,867 cm⁴ (10.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

Tee 210×267×51 vs WT 10.5X34
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…