CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

WT 5X30 vs Tee 254×127×45

WT 5X30 is an WT section from the American AISC Shapes Database; Tee 254×127×45 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). WT 5X30 carries more bending: 96.192 cm³ of plastic modulus against 94 cm³, 2.3% more. They weigh essentially the same, 44.6 kg/m and 44.4 kg/m. Both are about 130 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyWT 5X30
WT
Tee 254×127×45
Tees (from UC)
Difference
Mass44.6 kg/m44.4 kg/m+0.5%
Depth129.8 mm130.1 mm-0.2%
Width256.5 mm256.3 mm+0.1%
Web thickness10.7 mm10.3 mm+3.9%
Flange thickness17.3 mm17.3 mmsame
Area57 cm²56.7 cm²+0.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)536.9 cm⁴524 cm⁴+2.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)96.192 cm³94 cm³+2.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)49.817 cm³48.5 cm³+2.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,418 cm⁴2,430 cm⁴-0.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)286.77 cm³288 cm³-0.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.53 cm6.55 cm-0.3%
Torsion constant (It)51.2 cm⁴51.1 cm⁴+0.2%

WT 5X30 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; Tee 254×127×45 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to Tee 254×127×45.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, WT 5X30 has the larger second moment of area: 536.9 cm⁴ against 524 cm⁴, a difference of 2.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (2.2 against 2.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. WT sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Tees (from UC) to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, WT 5X30 is the stronger section and Tee 254×127×45 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

WT 5X30 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 96.192 cm³ against 94 cm³ - 2.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: WT 5X30 is 44.6 kg/m and Tee 254×127×45 is 44.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: Tee 254×127×45 gives 94 cm³ of plastic modulus and 524 cm⁴ of inertia against 96.192 cm³ and 536.9 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

WT 5X30, with a second moment of area of 536.9 cm⁴ against 524 cm⁴ (2.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…