CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

WT 7X54.5 vs ST 7.5X25

WT 7X54.5 is an WT section from the American AISC Shapes Database; ST 7.5X25 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. WT 7X54.5 carries more bending: 235.97 cm³ of plastic modulus against 229.42 cm³, 2.9% more. ST 7.5X25 is the lighter of the two at 37.2 kg/m against 81.1 kg/m, a saving of 118.0% on steel weight. ST 7.5X25 is deeper, 190.5 mm against 181.9 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyWT 7X54.5
WT
ST 7.5X25
ST
Difference
Mass81.1 kg/m37.2 kg/m+118.0%
Depth181.9 mm190.5 mm-4.5%
Width370.8 mm143.3 mm+158.8%
Web thickness13.3 mm14 mm-5.0%
Flange thickness21.8 mm15.8 mm+38.0%
Area103.2 cm²47.4 cm²+117.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,886 cm⁴1,686 cm⁴+11.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)235.97 cm³229.42 cm³+2.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)123.89 cm³126.51 cm³-2.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)9,282 cm⁴324.2 cm⁴+2763.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)758.72 cm³81.771 cm³+827.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.47 cm2.62 cm+261.5%
Torsion constant (It)147.8 cm⁴43.7 cm⁴+238.2%

WT 7X54.5 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; ST 7.5X25 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to ST 7.5X25.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, WT 7X54.5 has the larger second moment of area: 1,886 cm⁴ against 1,686 cm⁴, a difference of 11.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, ST 7.5X25 is the more efficient section: 6.2 against 2.9 cm³ per kg/m, 52.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: WT 7X54.5 has 758.72 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 81.771 cm³, 827.9% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

In short, WT 7X54.5 is the stronger section and ST 7.5X25 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

WT 7X54.5 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 235.97 cm³ against 229.42 cm³ - 2.9% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

ST 7.5X25 at 37.2 kg/m, against 81.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 118.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: ST 7.5X25 gives 229.42 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,686 cm⁴ of inertia against 235.97 cm³ and 1,886 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

WT 7X54.5, with a second moment of area of 1,886 cm⁴ against 1,686 cm⁴ (11.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…