CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

WT 8X22.5 vs ST 7.5X21.45

WT 8X22.5 is an WT section from the American AISC Shapes Database; ST 7.5X21.45 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 176.98 cm³ against 176.98 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. ST 7.5X21.45 is the lighter of the two at 31.9 kg/m against 33.5 kg/m, a saving of 5.0% on steel weight. WT 8X22.5 is deeper, 205 mm against 190.5 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyWT 8X22.5
WT
ST 7.5X21.45
ST
Difference
Mass33.5 kg/m31.9 kg/m+5.0%
Depth205 mm190.5 mm+7.6%
Width178.8 mm139.7 mm+28.0%
Web thickness8.8 mm10.4 mm-15.4%
Flange thickness14.4 mm15.8 mm-8.9%
Area42.8 cm²40.6 cm²+5.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,573 cm⁴1,369 cm⁴+14.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)176.98 cm³176.98 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)99.961 cm³98.159 cm³+1.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)682.6 cm⁴296.8 cm⁴+130.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)118.31 cm³74.397 cm³+59.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.99 cm2.69 cm+48.3%
Torsion constant (It)23.1 cm⁴31.84 cm⁴-27.4%

WT 8X22.5 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; ST 7.5X21.45 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to ST 7.5X21.45.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, WT 8X22.5 has the larger second moment of area: 1,573 cm⁴ against 1,369 cm⁴, a difference of 14.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, ST 7.5X21.45 is the more efficient section: 5.5 against 5.3 cm³ per kg/m, 4.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: WT 8X22.5 has 118.31 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 74.397 cm³, 59.0% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

In short, ST 7.5X21.45 is the stronger section and ST 7.5X21.45 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. WT 8X22.5 has a plastic modulus of 176.98 cm³ and ST 7.5X21.45 has 176.98 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

ST 7.5X21.45 at 31.9 kg/m, against 33.5 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: ST 7.5X21.45 gives 176.98 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,369 cm⁴ of inertia against 176.98 cm³ and 1,573 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

WT 8X22.5, with a second moment of area of 1,573 cm⁴ against 1,369 cm⁴ (14.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

Tee 178×203×34 vs WT 8X22.5Tee 178×203×34 vs ST 7.5X21.45
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…