CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 101.6×8 vs PIPE 3-1-2XS

CHS 101.6×8 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PIPE 3-1-2XS is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. CHS 101.6×8 carries more bending: 70.3 cm³ of plastic modulus against 66.695 cm³, 5.4% more. They weigh essentially the same, 18.5 kg/m and 18.6 kg/m. Both are about 102 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 101.6×8
CHS Hot-finished
PIPE 3-1-2XS
Pipe
Difference
Mass18.5 kg/m18.6 kg/m-0.5%
Depth101.6 mm101.6 mmsame
Width101.6 mm101.6 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm7.5 mm-100.0%
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area23.5 cm²22.1 cm²+6.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)260 cm⁴247.2 cm⁴+5.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)70.3 cm³66.695 cm³+5.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)51.1 cm³48.67 cm³+5.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)260 cm⁴247.2 cm⁴+5.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)70.3 cm³66.695 cm³+5.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.32 cm3.33 cm-0.3%
Torsion constant (It)519 cm⁴495.3 cm⁴+4.8%

CHS 101.6×8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; PIPE 3-1-2XS to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to PIPE 3-1-2XS.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CHS 101.6×8 has the larger second moment of area: 260 cm⁴ against 247.2 cm⁴, a difference of 5.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, CHS 101.6×8 is the more efficient section: 3.8 against 3.6 cm³ per kg/m, 6.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. CHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and Pipe to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, CHS 101.6×8 is the stronger section and CHS 101.6×8 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

CHS 101.6×8 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 70.3 cm³ against 66.695 cm³ - 5.4% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 101.6×8 is 18.5 kg/m and PIPE 3-1-2XS is 18.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PIPE 3-1-2XS gives 66.695 cm³ of plastic modulus and 247.2 cm⁴ of inertia against 70.3 cm³ and 260 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

CHS 101.6×8, with a second moment of area of 260 cm⁴ against 247.2 cm⁴ (5.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…