CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 114.3×3.6 vs CF CHS 114.3×3.5

CHS 114.3×3.6 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 114.3×3.5 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). CHS 114.3×3.6 carries more bending: 44.1 cm³ of plastic modulus against 43 cm³, 2.6% more. CF CHS 114.3×3.5 is the lighter of the two at 9.56 kg/m against 9.83 kg/m, a saving of 2.8% on steel weight. Both are about 114 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 114.3×3.6
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 114.3×3.5
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass9.8 kg/m9.6 kg/m+2.8%
Depth114.3 mm114.3 mmsame
Width114.3 mm114.3 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area12.5 cm²12.2 cm²+2.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)192 cm⁴187 cm⁴+2.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)44.1 cm³43 cm³+2.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)33.6 cm³32.7 cm³+2.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)192 cm⁴187 cm⁴+2.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)44.1 cm³43 cm³+2.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.92 cm3.92 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)384 cm⁴374 cm⁴+2.7%

CHS 114.3×3.6 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 114.3×3.5 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 114.3×3.5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CHS 114.3×3.6 has the larger second moment of area: 192 cm⁴ against 187 cm⁴, a difference of 2.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (4.5 against 4.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, CHS 114.3×3.6 is the stronger section and CF CHS 114.3×3.5 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

CHS 114.3×3.6 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 44.1 cm³ against 43 cm³ - 2.6% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

CF CHS 114.3×3.5 at 9.56 kg/m, against 9.83 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 114.3×3.5 gives 43 cm³ of plastic modulus and 187 cm⁴ of inertia against 44.1 cm³ and 192 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CHS 114.3×3.6, with a second moment of area of 192 cm⁴ against 187 cm⁴ (2.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…