CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 193.7×12.5 vs CF CHS 193.7×12.5

CHS 193.7×12.5 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 193.7×12.5 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 411 cm³ against 411 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 55.9 kg/m and 55.9 kg/m. Both are about 194 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 193.7×12.5
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 193.7×12.5
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass55.9 kg/m55.9 kg/msame
Depth193.7 mm193.7 mmsame
Width193.7 mm193.7 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area71.2 cm²71.2 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)2,930 cm⁴2,930 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)411 cm³411 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)303 cm³303 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,930 cm⁴2,930 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)411 cm³411 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.42 cm6.42 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)5,870 cm⁴5,870 cm⁴same

CHS 193.7×12.5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 193.7×12.5 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 193.7×12.5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 193.7×12.5 has the larger second moment of area: 2,930 cm⁴ against 2,930 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (7.4 against 7.4 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 193.7×12.5 has a plastic modulus of 411 cm³ and CF CHS 193.7×12.5 has 411 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 193.7×12.5 is 55.9 kg/m and CF CHS 193.7×12.5 is 55.9 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 193.7×12.5 gives 411 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,930 cm⁴ of inertia against 411 cm³ and 2,930 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 193.7×12.5, with a second moment of area of 2,930 cm⁴ against 2,930 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…