CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 219.1×8 vs PIPE 8STD

CHS 219.1×8 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PIPE 8STD is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. CHS 219.1×8 carries more bending: 357 cm³ of plastic modulus against 340.85 cm³, 4.7% more. CHS 219.1×8 is the lighter of the two at 41.6 kg/m against 42.6 kg/m, a saving of 2.3% on steel weight. Both are about 219 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 219.1×8
CHS Hot-finished
PIPE 8STD
Pipe
Difference
Mass41.6 kg/m42.6 kg/m-2.3%
Depth219.1 mm219.1 mmsame
Width219.1 mm219.1 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm7.6 mm-100.0%
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area53.1 cm²50.6 cm²+4.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)2,960 cm⁴2,835 cm⁴+4.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)357 cm³340.85 cm³+4.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)270 cm³258.92 cm³+4.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,960 cm⁴2,835 cm⁴+4.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)357 cm³340.85 cm³+4.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.47 cm7.49 cm-0.3%
Torsion constant (It)5,920 cm⁴5,661 cm⁴+4.6%

CHS 219.1×8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; PIPE 8STD to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to PIPE 8STD.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CHS 219.1×8 has the larger second moment of area: 2,960 cm⁴ against 2,835 cm⁴, a difference of 4.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, CHS 219.1×8 is the more efficient section: 8.6 against 8.0 cm³ per kg/m, 7.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. CHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and Pipe to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.3% weight.

In short, CHS 219.1×8 is the stronger section and CHS 219.1×8 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

CHS 219.1×8 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 357 cm³ against 340.85 cm³ - 4.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

CHS 219.1×8 at 41.6 kg/m, against 42.6 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.3%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PIPE 8STD gives 340.85 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,835 cm⁴ of inertia against 357 cm³ and 2,960 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

CHS 219.1×8, with a second moment of area of 2,960 cm⁴ against 2,835 cm⁴ (4.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

CHS 219.1×8 vs CF CHS 219.1×8
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…