CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 244.5×8 vs CF CHS 244.5×8

CHS 244.5×8 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 244.5×8 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 448 cm³ against 448 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 46.7 kg/m and 46.7 kg/m. Both are about 245 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 244.5×8
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 244.5×8
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass46.7 kg/m46.7 kg/msame
Depth244.5 mm244.5 mmsame
Width244.5 mm244.5 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area59.4 cm²59.4 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)4,160 cm⁴4,160 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)448 cm³448 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)340 cm³340 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,160 cm⁴4,160 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)448 cm³448 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)8.37 cm8.37 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)8,320 cm⁴8,320 cm⁴same

CHS 244.5×8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 244.5×8 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 244.5×8.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 244.5×8 has the larger second moment of area: 4,160 cm⁴ against 4,160 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (9.6 against 9.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 244.5×8 has a plastic modulus of 448 cm³ and CF CHS 244.5×8 has 448 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 244.5×8 is 46.7 kg/m and CF CHS 244.5×8 is 46.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 244.5×8 gives 448 cm³ of plastic modulus and 4,160 cm⁴ of inertia against 448 cm³ and 4,160 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 244.5×8, with a second moment of area of 4,160 cm⁴ against 4,160 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…