CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 273×12.5 vs PIPE 10XS

CHS 273×12.5 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PIPE 10XS is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. CHS 273×12.5 carries more bending: 849 cm³ of plastic modulus against 806.24 cm³, 5.3% more. They weigh essentially the same, 80.3 kg/m and 81.6 kg/m. Both are about 273 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 273×12.5
CHS Hot-finished
PIPE 10XS
Pipe
Difference
Mass80.3 kg/m81.6 kg/m-1.6%
Depth273 mm273.1 mmsame
Width273 mm273.1 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm11.8 mm-100.0%
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area102 cm²97.4 cm²+4.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)8,700 cm⁴8,283 cm⁴+5.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)849 cm³806.24 cm³+5.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)637 cm³606.32 cm³+5.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)8,700 cm⁴8,283 cm⁴+5.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)849 cm³806.24 cm³+5.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.22 cm9.25 cm-0.3%
Torsion constant (It)17,400 cm⁴16,566 cm⁴+5.0%

CHS 273×12.5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; PIPE 10XS to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to PIPE 10XS.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CHS 273×12.5 has the larger second moment of area: 8,700 cm⁴ against 8,283 cm⁴, a difference of 5.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, CHS 273×12.5 is the more efficient section: 10.6 against 9.9 cm³ per kg/m, 7.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. CHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and Pipe to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, CHS 273×12.5 is the stronger section and CHS 273×12.5 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

CHS 273×12.5 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 849 cm³ against 806.24 cm³ - 5.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 273×12.5 is 80.3 kg/m and PIPE 10XS is 81.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PIPE 10XS gives 806.24 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,283 cm⁴ of inertia against 849 cm³ and 8,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

CHS 273×12.5, with a second moment of area of 8,700 cm⁴ against 8,283 cm⁴ (5.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

CHS 273×12.5 vs CF CHS 273×12.5
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…