CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 273×16 vs CF CHS 273×16

CHS 273×16 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 273×16 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1060 cm³ against 1060 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 101 kg/m and 101 kg/m. Both are about 273 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 273×16
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 273×16
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass101 kg/m101 kg/msame
Depth273 mm273 mmsame
Width273 mm273 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area129 cm²129 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)10,700 cm⁴10,700 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,060 cm³1,060 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)784 cm³784 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)10,700 cm⁴10,700 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,060 cm³1,060 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.1 cm9.1 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)21,400 cm⁴21,400 cm⁴same

CHS 273×16 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 273×16 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 273×16.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 273×16 has the larger second moment of area: 10,700 cm⁴ against 10,700 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (10.5 against 10.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 273×16 has a plastic modulus of 1060 cm³ and CF CHS 273×16 has 1060 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 273×16 is 101 kg/m and CF CHS 273×16 is 101 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 273×16 gives 1060 cm³ of plastic modulus and 10,700 cm⁴ of inertia against 1060 cm³ and 10,700 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 273×16, with a second moment of area of 10,700 cm⁴ against 10,700 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…