CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 323.9×12.5 vs PIPE 12XS

CHS 323.9×12.5 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PIPE 12XS is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. CHS 323.9×12.5 carries more bending: 1210 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1150.4 cm³, 5.2% more. They weigh essentially the same, 96 kg/m and 97.5 kg/m. Both are about 324 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 323.9×12.5
CHS Hot-finished
PIPE 12XS
Pipe
Difference
Mass96 kg/m97.5 kg/m-1.5%
Depth323.9 mm323.8 mmsame
Width323.9 mm323.8 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm11.8 mm-100.0%
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area122 cm²112.9 cm²+8.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)14,800 cm⁴14,110 cm⁴+4.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,210 cm³1,150.4 cm³+5.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)917 cm³871.79 cm³+5.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)14,800 cm⁴14,110 cm⁴+4.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,210 cm³1,150.4 cm³+5.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)11 cm11.05 cm-0.5%
Torsion constant (It)29,700 cm⁴28,220 cm⁴+5.2%

CHS 323.9×12.5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; PIPE 12XS to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to PIPE 12XS.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CHS 323.9×12.5 has the larger second moment of area: 14,800 cm⁴ against 14,110 cm⁴, a difference of 4.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, CHS 323.9×12.5 is the more efficient section: 12.6 against 11.8 cm³ per kg/m, 6.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. CHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and Pipe to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, CHS 323.9×12.5 is the stronger section and CHS 323.9×12.5 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

CHS 323.9×12.5 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1210 cm³ against 1150.4 cm³ - 5.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 323.9×12.5 is 96 kg/m and PIPE 12XS is 97.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PIPE 12XS gives 1150.4 cm³ of plastic modulus and 14,110 cm⁴ of inertia against 1210 cm³ and 14,800 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

CHS 323.9×12.5, with a second moment of area of 14,800 cm⁴ against 14,110 cm⁴ (4.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

CHS 323.9×12.5 vs CF CHS 323.9×12.5
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…