CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 323.9×14.2 vs PIPE 14XS

CHS 323.9×14.2 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PIPE 14XS is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1360 cm³ against 1355.2 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.4%. They weigh essentially the same, 108 kg/m and 107.4 kg/m. PIPE 14XS is deeper, 355.6 mm against 323.9 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 323.9×14.2
CHS Hot-finished
PIPE 14XS
Pipe
Difference
Mass108 kg/m107.4 kg/m+0.6%
Depth323.9 mm355.6 mm-8.9%
Width323.9 mm355.6 mm-8.9%
Web thickness0 mm11.8 mm-100.0%
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area138 cm²123.9 cm²+11.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)16,600 cm⁴18,314 cm⁴-9.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,360 cm³1,355.2 cm³+0.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,030 cm³1,030.7 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)16,600 cm⁴18,314 cm⁴-9.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,360 cm³1,355.2 cm³+0.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)11 cm12.17 cm-9.6%
Torsion constant (It)33,200 cm⁴36,628 cm⁴-9.4%

CHS 323.9×14.2 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; PIPE 14XS to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to PIPE 14XS.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PIPE 14XS has the larger second moment of area: 18,314 cm⁴ against 16,600 cm⁴, a difference of 9.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (12.6 against 12.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. CHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and Pipe to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 323.9×14.2 has a plastic modulus of 1360 cm³ and PIPE 14XS has 1355.2 cm³, a difference of only 0.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 323.9×14.2 is 108 kg/m and PIPE 14XS is 107.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PIPE 14XS gives 1355.2 cm³ of plastic modulus and 18,314 cm⁴ of inertia against 1360 cm³ and 16,600 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PIPE 14XS, with a second moment of area of 18,314 cm⁴ against 16,600 cm⁴ (9.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…