CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 323.9×16 vs CF CHS 323.9×16

CHS 323.9×16 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 323.9×16 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1520 cm³ against 1520 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 121 kg/m and 121 kg/m. Both are about 324 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 323.9×16
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 323.9×16
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass121 kg/m121 kg/msame
Depth323.9 mm323.9 mmsame
Width323.9 mm323.9 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area155 cm²155 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)18,400 cm⁴18,400 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,520 cm³1,520 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,140 cm³1,140 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)18,400 cm⁴18,400 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,520 cm³1,520 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)10.9 cm10.9 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)36,800 cm⁴36,800 cm⁴same

CHS 323.9×16 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 323.9×16 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 323.9×16.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 323.9×16 has the larger second moment of area: 18,400 cm⁴ against 18,400 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (12.6 against 12.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 323.9×16 has a plastic modulus of 1520 cm³ and CF CHS 323.9×16 has 1520 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 323.9×16 is 121 kg/m and CF CHS 323.9×16 is 121 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 323.9×16 gives 1520 cm³ of plastic modulus and 18,400 cm⁴ of inertia against 1520 cm³ and 18,400 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 323.9×16, with a second moment of area of 18,400 cm⁴ against 18,400 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…