CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 355.6×16 vs CF CHS 355.6×16

CHS 355.6×16 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 355.6×16 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1850 cm³ against 1850 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 134 kg/m and 134 kg/m. Both are about 356 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 355.6×16
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 355.6×16
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass134 kg/m134 kg/msame
Depth355.6 mm355.6 mmsame
Width355.6 mm355.6 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area171 cm²171 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)24,700 cm⁴24,700 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,850 cm³1,850 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,390 cm³1,390 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)24,700 cm⁴24,700 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,850 cm³1,850 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)12 cm12 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)49,300 cm⁴49,300 cm⁴same

CHS 355.6×16 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 355.6×16 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 355.6×16.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 355.6×16 has the larger second moment of area: 24,700 cm⁴ against 24,700 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (13.8 against 13.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 355.6×16 has a plastic modulus of 1850 cm³ and CF CHS 355.6×16 has 1850 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 355.6×16 is 134 kg/m and CF CHS 355.6×16 is 134 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 355.6×16 gives 1850 cm³ of plastic modulus and 24,700 cm⁴ of inertia against 1850 cm³ and 24,700 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 355.6×16, with a second moment of area of 24,700 cm⁴ against 24,700 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…