CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 355.6×6.3 vs CF CHS 355.6×6.3

CHS 355.6×6.3 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 355.6×6.3 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 769 cm³ against 769 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 54.3 kg/m and 54.3 kg/m. Both are about 356 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 355.6×6.3
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 355.6×6.3
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass54.3 kg/m54.3 kg/msame
Depth355.6 mm355.6 mmsame
Width355.6 mm355.6 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area69.1 cm²69.1 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)10,500 cm⁴10,500 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)769 cm³769 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)593 cm³593 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)10,500 cm⁴10,500 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)769 cm³769 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)12.4 cm12.4 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)21,100 cm⁴21,100 cm⁴same

CHS 355.6×6.3 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 355.6×6.3 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 355.6×6.3.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 355.6×6.3 has the larger second moment of area: 10,500 cm⁴ against 10,500 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (14.2 against 14.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 355.6×6.3 has a plastic modulus of 769 cm³ and CF CHS 355.6×6.3 has 769 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 355.6×6.3 is 54.3 kg/m and CF CHS 355.6×6.3 is 54.3 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 355.6×6.3 gives 769 cm³ of plastic modulus and 10,500 cm⁴ of inertia against 769 cm³ and 10,500 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 355.6×6.3, with a second moment of area of 10,500 cm⁴ against 10,500 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…