CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 406.4×12.5 vs CF CHS 406.4×12.5

CHS 406.4×12.5 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 406.4×12.5 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1940 cm³ against 1940 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 121 kg/m and 121 kg/m. Both are about 406 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 406.4×12.5
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 406.4×12.5
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass121 kg/m121 kg/msame
Depth406.4 mm406.4 mmsame
Width406.4 mm406.4 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area155 cm²155 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)30,000 cm⁴30,000 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,940 cm³1,940 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,480 cm³1,480 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)30,000 cm⁴30,000 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,940 cm³1,940 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)13.9 cm13.9 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)60,100 cm⁴60,100 cm⁴same

CHS 406.4×12.5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 406.4×12.5 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 406.4×12.5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 406.4×12.5 has the larger second moment of area: 30,000 cm⁴ against 30,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (16.0 against 16.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 406.4×12.5 has a plastic modulus of 1940 cm³ and CF CHS 406.4×12.5 has 1940 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 406.4×12.5 is 121 kg/m and CF CHS 406.4×12.5 is 121 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 406.4×12.5 gives 1940 cm³ of plastic modulus and 30,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 1940 cm³ and 30,000 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 406.4×12.5, with a second moment of area of 30,000 cm⁴ against 30,000 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…