CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 406.4×16 vs CF CHS 406.4×16

CHS 406.4×16 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 406.4×16 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2440 cm³ against 2440 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 154 kg/m and 154 kg/m. Both are about 406 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 406.4×16
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 406.4×16
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass154 kg/m154 kg/msame
Depth406.4 mm406.4 mmsame
Width406.4 mm406.4 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area196 cm²196 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)37,400 cm⁴37,400 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,440 cm³2,440 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,840 cm³1,840 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)37,400 cm⁴37,400 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,440 cm³2,440 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)13.8 cm13.8 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)74,900 cm⁴74,900 cm⁴same

CHS 406.4×16 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 406.4×16 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 406.4×16.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 406.4×16 has the larger second moment of area: 37,400 cm⁴ against 37,400 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (15.8 against 15.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 406.4×16 has a plastic modulus of 2440 cm³ and CF CHS 406.4×16 has 2440 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 406.4×16 is 154 kg/m and CF CHS 406.4×16 is 154 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 406.4×16 gives 2440 cm³ of plastic modulus and 37,400 cm⁴ of inertia against 2440 cm³ and 37,400 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 406.4×16, with a second moment of area of 37,400 cm⁴ against 37,400 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…