CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 42.4×3.2 vs PIPE 1-1-4STD

CHS 42.4×3.2 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PIPE 1-1-4STD is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 4.93 cm³ against 4.998 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.4%. CHS 42.4×3.2 is the lighter of the two at 3.09 kg/m against 3.4 kg/m, a saving of 9.1% on steel weight. Both are about 42 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 42.4×3.2
CHS Hot-finished
PIPE 1-1-4STD
Pipe
Difference
Mass3.1 kg/m3.4 kg/m-9.1%
Depth42.4 mm42.2 mm+0.5%
Width42.4 mm42.2 mm+0.5%
Web thickness0 mm3.3 mm-100.0%
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area3.9 cm²4 cm²-1.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)7.62 cm⁴7.66 cm⁴-0.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4.93 cm³4.998 cm³-1.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3.59 cm³3.638 cm³-1.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)7.62 cm⁴7.66 cm⁴-0.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)4.93 cm³4.998 cm³-1.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)1.39 cm1.38 cm+0.7%
Torsion constant (It)15.2 cm⁴15.32 cm⁴-0.8%

CHS 42.4×3.2 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; PIPE 1-1-4STD to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to PIPE 1-1-4STD.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PIPE 1-1-4STD has the larger second moment of area: 7.66 cm⁴ against 7.62 cm⁴, a difference of 0.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, CHS 42.4×3.2 is the more efficient section: 1.6 against 1.5 cm³ per kg/m, 8.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. CHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and Pipe to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 9.1% weight.

In short, PIPE 1-1-4STD is the stronger section and CHS 42.4×3.2 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 42.4×3.2 has a plastic modulus of 4.93 cm³ and PIPE 1-1-4STD has 4.998 cm³, a difference of only 1.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

CHS 42.4×3.2 at 3.09 kg/m, against 3.4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 9.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PIPE 1-1-4STD gives 4.998 cm³ of plastic modulus and 7.66 cm⁴ of inertia against 4.93 cm³ and 7.62 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PIPE 1-1-4STD, with a second moment of area of 7.66 cm⁴ against 7.62 cm⁴ (0.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

CHS 42.4×3.2 vs CF CHS 42.4×3
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…