CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 457×12.5 vs CF CHS 457×12.5

CHS 457×12.5 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 457×12.5 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2470 cm³ against 2470 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 137 kg/m and 137 kg/m. Both are about 457 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 457×12.5
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 457×12.5
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass137 kg/m137 kg/msame
Depth457 mm457 mmsame
Width457 mm457 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area175 cm²175 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)43,100 cm⁴43,100 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,470 cm³2,470 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,890 cm³1,890 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)43,100 cm⁴43,100 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,470 cm³2,470 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)15.7 cm15.7 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)86,300 cm⁴86,300 cm⁴same

CHS 457×12.5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 457×12.5 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 457×12.5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 457×12.5 has the larger second moment of area: 43,100 cm⁴ against 43,100 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (18.0 against 18.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 457×12.5 has a plastic modulus of 2470 cm³ and CF CHS 457×12.5 has 2470 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 457×12.5 is 137 kg/m and CF CHS 457×12.5 is 137 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 457×12.5 gives 2470 cm³ of plastic modulus and 43,100 cm⁴ of inertia against 2470 cm³ and 43,100 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 457×12.5, with a second moment of area of 43,100 cm⁴ against 43,100 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…