CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 457×8 vs CF CHS 457×8

CHS 457×8 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 457×8 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1610 cm³ against 1610 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 88.6 kg/m and 88.6 kg/m. Both are about 457 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 457×8
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 457×8
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass88.6 kg/m88.6 kg/msame
Depth457 mm457 mmsame
Width457 mm457 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area113 cm²113 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)28,400 cm⁴28,400 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,610 cm³1,610 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,250 cm³1,250 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)28,400 cm⁴28,400 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,610 cm³1,610 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)15.9 cm15.9 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)56,900 cm⁴56,900 cm⁴same

CHS 457×8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 457×8 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 457×8.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 457×8 has the larger second moment of area: 28,400 cm⁴ against 28,400 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (18.2 against 18.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 457×8 has a plastic modulus of 1610 cm³ and CF CHS 457×8 has 1610 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 457×8 is 88.6 kg/m and CF CHS 457×8 is 88.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 457×8 gives 1610 cm³ of plastic modulus and 28,400 cm⁴ of inertia against 1610 cm³ and 28,400 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 457×8, with a second moment of area of 28,400 cm⁴ against 28,400 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…