CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 48.3×3.2 vs PIPE 1-1-2STD

CHS 48.3×3.2 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PIPE 1-1-2STD is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. PIPE 1-1-2STD carries more bending: 6.899 cm³ of plastic modulus against 6.52 cm³, 5.5% more. CHS 48.3×3.2 is the lighter of the two at 3.56 kg/m against 4 kg/m, a saving of 11.0% on steel weight. Both are about 48 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 48.3×3.2
CHS Hot-finished
PIPE 1-1-2STD
Pipe
Difference
Mass3.6 kg/m4 kg/m-11.0%
Depth48.3 mm48.3 mmsame
Width48.3 mm48.3 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm3.4 mm-100.0%
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area4.5 cm²4.8 cm²-5.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)11.6 cm⁴12.2 cm⁴-4.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)6.52 cm³6.899 cm³-5.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4.8 cm³5.064 cm³-5.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)11.6 cm⁴12.2 cm⁴-4.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)6.52 cm³6.899 cm³-5.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)1.6 cm1.59 cm+0.6%
Torsion constant (It)23.2 cm⁴24.39 cm⁴-4.9%

CHS 48.3×3.2 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; PIPE 1-1-2STD to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to PIPE 1-1-2STD.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PIPE 1-1-2STD has the larger second moment of area: 12.2 cm⁴ against 11.6 cm⁴, a difference of 4.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, CHS 48.3×3.2 is the more efficient section: 1.8 against 1.7 cm³ per kg/m, 6.2% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. CHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and Pipe to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 11.0% weight.

In short, PIPE 1-1-2STD is the stronger section and CHS 48.3×3.2 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

PIPE 1-1-2STD is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 6.899 cm³ against 6.52 cm³ - 5.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

CHS 48.3×3.2 at 3.56 kg/m, against 4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 11.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PIPE 1-1-2STD gives 6.899 cm³ of plastic modulus and 12.2 cm⁴ of inertia against 6.52 cm³ and 11.6 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PIPE 1-1-2STD, with a second moment of area of 12.2 cm⁴ against 11.6 cm⁴ (4.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

CHS 48.3×3.2 vs CF CHS 48.3×3CHS 48.3×3.6 vs PIPE 1-1-2STD
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…