CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 48.3×5 vs PIPE 1-1-2XS

CHS 48.3×5 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PIPE 1-1-2XS is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. CHS 48.3×5 carries more bending: 9.42 cm³ of plastic modulus against 8.996 cm³, 4.7% more. They weigh essentially the same, 5.34 kg/m and 5.4 kg/m. Both are about 48 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 48.3×5
CHS Hot-finished
PIPE 1-1-2XS
Pipe
Difference
Mass5.3 kg/m5.4 kg/m-1.1%
Depth48.3 mm48.3 mmsame
Width48.3 mm48.3 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm4.7 mm-100.0%
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area6.8 cm²6.5 cm²+4.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)16.2 cm⁴15.48 cm⁴+4.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)9.42 cm³8.996 cm³+4.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)6.69 cm³6.424 cm³+4.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)16.2 cm⁴15.48 cm⁴+4.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)9.42 cm³8.996 cm³+4.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)1.54 cm1.55 cm-0.6%
Torsion constant (It)32.3 cm⁴30.97 cm⁴+4.3%

CHS 48.3×5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; PIPE 1-1-2XS to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to PIPE 1-1-2XS.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CHS 48.3×5 has the larger second moment of area: 16.2 cm⁴ against 15.48 cm⁴, a difference of 4.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, CHS 48.3×5 is the more efficient section: 1.8 against 1.7 cm³ per kg/m, 5.9% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. CHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and Pipe to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, CHS 48.3×5 is the stronger section and CHS 48.3×5 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

CHS 48.3×5 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 9.42 cm³ against 8.996 cm³ - 4.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 48.3×5 is 5.34 kg/m and PIPE 1-1-2XS is 5.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PIPE 1-1-2XS gives 8.996 cm³ of plastic modulus and 15.48 cm⁴ of inertia against 9.42 cm³ and 16.2 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

CHS 48.3×5, with a second moment of area of 16.2 cm⁴ against 15.48 cm⁴ (4.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

CHS 48.3×4.5 vs PIPE 1-1-2XS
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…