CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 60.3×4 vs CF CHS 60.3×4

CHS 60.3×4 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 60.3×4 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 12.7 cm³ against 12.7 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 5.55 kg/m and 5.55 kg/m. Both are about 60 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 60.3×4
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 60.3×4
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass5.5 kg/m5.5 kg/msame
Depth60.3 mm60.3 mmsame
Width60.3 mm60.3 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area7.1 cm²7.1 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)28.2 cm⁴28.2 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)12.7 cm³12.7 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)9.34 cm³9.34 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)28.2 cm⁴28.2 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)12.7 cm³12.7 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2 cm2 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)56.3 cm⁴56.3 cm⁴same

CHS 60.3×4 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 60.3×4 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 60.3×4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 60.3×4 has the larger second moment of area: 28.2 cm⁴ against 28.2 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (2.3 against 2.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 60.3×4 has a plastic modulus of 12.7 cm³ and CF CHS 60.3×4 has 12.7 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 60.3×4 is 5.55 kg/m and CF CHS 60.3×4 is 5.55 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 60.3×4 gives 12.7 cm³ of plastic modulus and 28.2 cm⁴ of inertia against 12.7 cm³ and 28.2 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 60.3×4, with a second moment of area of 28.2 cm⁴ against 28.2 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…