CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

HE 400 A vs HP 16X88

HE 400 A is an HE section from the European (Continental) range; HP 16X88 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. HP 16X88 carries more bending: 2638.3 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2560 cm³, 3.0% more. HE 400 A is the lighter of the two at 125 kg/m against 131 kg/m, a saving of 4.6% on steel weight. Both are about 389 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyHE 400 A
HE
HP 16X88
HP
Difference
Mass125 kg/m131 kg/m-4.6%
Depth390 mm388.6 mm+0.4%
Width300 mm398.8 mm-24.8%
Web thickness11 mm13.7 mm-19.7%
Flange thickness19 mm13.7 mm+38.7%
Area159 cm²166.5 cm²-4.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)45,100 cm⁴46,202 cm⁴-2.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,560 cm³2,638.3 cm³-3.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,310 cm³2,376.1 cm³-2.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)8,560 cm⁴14,526 cm⁴-41.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)873 cm³1,117.6 cm³-21.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.34 cm9.35 cm-21.5%
Torsion constant (It)193 cm⁴143.6 cm⁴+34.4%

HE 400 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; HP 16X88 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to HP 16X88.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HP 16X88 has the larger second moment of area: 46,202 cm⁴ against 45,100 cm⁴, a difference of 2.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (20.5 against 20.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: HP 16X88 has 1117.6 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 873 cm³, 21.9% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. HE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and HP to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.6% weight.

In short, HP 16X88 is the stronger section and HE 400 A is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

HP 16X88 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2638.3 cm³ against 2560 cm³ - 3.0% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

HE 400 A at 125 kg/m, against 131 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HP 16X88 gives 2638.3 cm³ of plastic modulus and 46,202 cm⁴ of inertia against 2560 cm³ and 45,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HP 16X88, with a second moment of area of 46,202 cm⁴ against 45,100 cm⁴ (2.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

HE 400 A vs H-400x300x12x19
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…