CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 200 vs H-200x100x5.5x8-21.3

IPE 200 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; H-200x100x5.5x8-21.3 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. IPE 200 carries more bending: 221 cm³ of plastic modulus against 209 cm³, 5.7% more. H-200x100x5.5x8-21.3 is the lighter of the two at 21.3 kg/m against 22.4 kg/m, a saving of 5.2% on steel weight. Both are about 200 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 200
IPE
H-200x100x5.5x8-21.3
MB & MC
Difference
Mass22.4 kg/m21.3 kg/m+5.2%
Depth200 mm200 mmsame
Width100 mm100 mmsame
Web thickness5.6 mm5.5 mm+1.8%
Flange thickness8.5 mm8 mm+6.3%
Area28.5 cm²27.2 cm²+4.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,940 cm⁴1,844 cm⁴+5.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)221 cm³209 cm³+5.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)194 cm³184 cm³+5.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)142 cm⁴134 cm⁴+6.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)44.6 cm³41.9 cm³+6.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.24 cm2.22 cm+0.9%
Torsion constant (It)6.92 cm⁴5.77 cm⁴+19.9%

IPE 200 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; H-200x100x5.5x8-21.3 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-200x100x5.5x8-21.3.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE 200 has the larger second moment of area: 1,940 cm⁴ against 1,844 cm⁴, a difference of 5.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (9.9 against 9.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, IPE 200 is the stronger section and H-200x100x5.5x8-21.3 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

IPE 200 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 221 cm³ against 209 cm³ - 5.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

H-200x100x5.5x8-21.3 at 21.3 kg/m, against 22.4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-200x100x5.5x8-21.3 gives 209 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,844 cm⁴ of inertia against 221 cm³ and 1,940 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

IPE 200, with a second moment of area of 1,940 cm⁴ against 1,844 cm⁴ (5.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 200 vs W 8X15
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…